Archive for January, 2010

Post by: davidd

Author
  • Articles
  • Print
  • Save / Share

Jan 29, 2010

The CRT Strategy – Charitable Remainder Trusts

Suppose you own a valuable asset that does not earn any income or it earns very little income.  Let us assume that this property has substantially appreciated in value such that, if you sold it today, you would realize a substantial gain and resulting tax on the gain.  So how can you turn this valuable property into an income producing source without erosion to principal due to taxation?

Answer:  By conveying the property to a Charitable Remainder Trust (CRT).

Here’s how it works:  After the trustor/donor transfers property to the CRT, the property is sold by the trustee.  There is no tax on the sale since the CRT is exempt from income tax under Section 664(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code.  The proceeds from the sale are invested into income producing property.  The trustee distributes income to the trustor during his or her lifetime.  Upon death of the trustor, the remaining property (corpus) is transferred to a designated charity.

Besides the benefit of avoiding tax from a taxable sale, in the year of transfer to the CRT, the trustor receives a charitable contribution deduction for the computed value of the charitable remainder interest.  The charitable remainder interest computation is based upon the value of the property transferred to the trust, the type of trust, the payout rate, frequency of payments each year, the mortality table, the applicable federal interest rate, and the age of the trustor.

There are two types of charitable remainder trusts Read the rest of this entry »


Post by: peterh

Author
  • Articles
  • Print
  • Save / Share

Jan 20, 2010

Successfully Executing the Optimal Exit Strategy – Positioning Strategies

Part 3 of 7

We have been looking at the two-fold challenge faced by Business Owners wishing to “extract themselves and their wealth” from their businesses in the next decade.  Firstly, that the economic recovery may be slow, and, secondly, that the retirement of the Baby Boomers will put “10 million” businesses on the market in this period.

From this perspective, we recognize that many companies will not sell without careful planning and preparation.  The point of considering possible “Positioning Strategies” is that most business are not being run with a mind to “selling”, and are typically not optimally prepared for an exit because:

  1. the ownership and management roles are not properly separated, and
  2. the key determinants of value, namely growth and risk, are not calibrated to the expectations and desires of market buyers (investors)

Exiting through a sale, recapitalization or merger generally involves investors and may involve lenders. Management is pivotal.  Exiting through a transfer of the business to family, management or employees, or through a gifting strategy, may or may not involve lenders but, once again, management is a pivotal issue.  Exiting through liquidation, on the other hand, does not depend on management to the same extent.

Generally, the different Exit Strategies depend on key considerations as follows: Read the rest of this entry »


Post by: davidd

Author
  • Articles
  • Print
  • Save / Share

Jan 15, 2010

The Leveraged ESOP Rollover

Although sales price and terms are important components of any stock sale transaction, the structure of such a transaction can have a major effect upon what the seller is left with after taxes are paid on the resulting capital gain.  In the case of a management buyout transaction, a structure worthy of consideration involves the use of a leveraged ESOP.

ESOP is an acronym for Employee Stock Ownership Plan, which is a special type of qualified employee benefit plan.  An ESOP is a defined contribution plan that can emulate either a money purchase pension plan or a profit sharing plan.  An ESOP is similar to a stock bonus plan except that, unlike a stock bonus plan, it can utilize the credit of the company, borrow funds from outside sources, and use the funds to purchase company stock from existing stockholders.  The fact that an ESOP can enter into this type of leveraged transaction is what makes it different from all other qualified employee benefit plans.  The act of borrowing funds through the credit of the company and buying company shares is considered a prohibited transaction for all other employee benefit plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”).

As with other employee benefit plans, the ESOP operates as a trust.  Therefore, an Employee Stock Ownership Trust (“ESOT”) is created and a designated trustee or trustees serve in a fiduciary capacity on behalf of the employee beneficiaries of the trust.  The trustee or trustees for the ESOT are appointed by the company’s board of directors. Read the rest of this entry »